Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

Van Hollen, Peters, Bipartisan Colleagues Introduce Bill Removing Presidential Authority to Provide Aid to Azerbaijan following Attacks on Armenian People


sharelogo.jpg

October 05, 2023

U.S. Senators Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), Gary Peters (D-Mich.), Marco Rubio (R-Fla.), Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.), Bill Cassidy (R-La.), Pete Ricketts (R-Neb.) and John Kennedy (R-La.) introduced legislation that would prevent the U.S. from providing security assistance to Azerbaijan until it has been determined that they are not taking offensive action against the Armenians. The Senators introduced the legislation in response to the unilateral seizure, by force of arms, of Nagorno-Karabakh by Azerbaijan.

“The United States must send a clear message that we will not support the Azeri regime as it continues its campaign of ethnic cleansing against Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh,” said Senator Van Hollen. “That’s why, in the face of its continued aggression and its blocking of critical humanitarian assistance, the Administration should immediately revoke Azerbaijan’s access to U.S. security assistance.”

“The Azerbaijani government has made it clear – it will use its military resources to eliminate the presence of Armenians in Nagorno-Karabakh.” said Senator Peters. “The United States cannot be complicit in Azerbaijani violence against the Armenian people. We must pass this legislation to block additional American aid to Azerbaijan until it puts an end to its aggression in the region.”

“It’s absurd that our nation has provided security assistance to Azerbaijan for decades, despite existing law requiring the President to certify that Azerbaijan is not taking offensive action against Armenian,” said Senator Rubio. “This bill is an important first step, as would be sanctioning Azerbaijani officials under the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act.”

“The United States must take a stand to make sure the Azerbaijani government does not inflict further suffering on ethnic Armenians,” said Senator Shaheen. “I’m proud to help introduce this bipartisan legislation, which is intended to hold Azerbaijan accountable for its actions in Nagorno-Karabakh.”

“Through the 907 waiver authority, Americans saw their tax money used to provide weapons to Azerbaijan to attack lands where Armenians have lived for centuries. That is not only wrong, it’s perverse. This bill withdraws that authority,” said Dr. Cassidy.

The Armenian Protection Act would end U.S. assistance to the Azerbaijani government that is currently allowed under a waiver to Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act. Although the Freedom Support Act generally prohibits most bilateral assistance to Azerbaijan, following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, waiver authority was added to Section 907 granting additional discretion to the President to provide aid to Azerbaijan. The waiver authority has been invoked annually by Presidents of both parties since 2002 and the Biden Administration is still reviewing its waiver authority for 2023.

The post Van Hollen, Peters, Bipartisan Colleagues Introduce Bill Removing Presidential Authority to Provide Aid to Azerbaijan following Attacks on Armenian People first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.


Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

Q&A | The Geopolitics of Caspian Gas – Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University SIPA | CGEP %


Pipeline development in the Caspian region comes with geopolitical complexity. The countries directly involved in the Southern Gas Corridor (SGC)Turkey and Azerbaijanas well as Turkmenistan, Russia, and Iran have diverging geopolitical goals. Turkey and Azerbaijan are trying to maintain relations with both Russia and the European Union (EU) and Turkmenistan is trying to balance gas supplies between China and the EU while avoiding deteriorating relationships with its northern neighbors: Russia, Uzbekistan, and Kazakhstan. Russia and Iran are trying to break geopolitical isolation, increase their influence in the region, and monetize locked-in gas reserves. Following an analysis of the economics of Caspian gas, in this Q&A, the author discusses how the challenge of balancing contradictory interests could be a risk for the EU, in terms of both the reliability of gas supply and instability in the region. 

Facing increasing pressure from the West, Russia has increased its efforts to reestablish a sphere of influence in Caspian and Central Asia. So far Russian authorities have taken the readiness of Azerbaijan and Turkey to increase gas supplies to the EU calmly, as they try to maintain friendly relations with the leaders of Azerbaijan, Turkey and Turkmenistan

There is no visible deterioration in relations between Russia and Azerbaijan[1] with presidents Vladmir Putin and Ilham Aliyev regularly meeting one another. Since 2022, Azerbaijan has provided an overland trade corridor between Iran and Russia, which has become extremely significant for Russia under sanctions [2]. There has also been a noticeable economic convergence between Russia and Turkmenistan in the past year and a half.[3] Amid frequent meetings, the two countries signed the Declaration on Deepening Strategic Partnership in June 2022. In particular, bilateral cooperation in the gas, oil and electricity sectors is growing, with Gazprom and Tatneft increasing their activities in the Turkmen market.[4]

Turkey has become a key Russian political and economic partner since the sanctions against Russia were introduced in 2022. Just before his re-election, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan had stated that “Russia and Turkey need each other in every possible field.”[5] Despite the country’s membership of NATO, Turkey has, in fact, stepped up its economic ties with Russia since the start of the war, increasing imports of Russian oil embargoed by European countries.[6] In 2022, 40 percent of Turkey’s gas imports came from Russia.[7]

For now, the benefits to Russia of maintaining good relations with Turkic countries outweigh any potential downsides, including competition with these countries in the EU gas market. As discussed in the previous article.   Russia need not worry too much about competition; Azerbaijan itself is importing gas from Turkmenistan to fill gaps at the moment, while Turkmenistan is limited by the challenges of building the Trans-Caspian pipeline and commitments to China. And Turkey is now the biggest net importer of Russian gas.

Amidst declining export revenue, Russia is interested in holding onto the remaining opportunities to generate at least some income from gas exports to countries like Azerbaijan and Turkey. But there are still some “red lines”; Russia makes it clear that it would obstruct any attempt to build a Trans-Caspian pipeline on environmental grounds.[8] 

Source: https://www.sgc.az/en.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan, re-elected as the President of Turkey in May 2023, has repeatedly announced his ambition to make Turkey a gas hub, while continuing to maintain special relations with Russia. He has frequently mentioned plans “to turn Turkey into a center in the energy sector of the Mediterranean, the Caspian region, and the Middle East.”[9] Putin echoes this rhetoric, but his statements seem to be motivated by the desire to send more Russian pipeline gas to Turkey, which can then be re-exported to Europe.[10] Putin observed in a meeting with Erdogan earlier this month that  Gazprom has submitted a road map for the hub to Turkish energy company BOTAS.[11] This suggests the likelihood of further strengthening of ties between Turkey and Russia. At the same time, since his re-lection, Erdogan has also been speaking about Turkey’s ambition to join the EU, although he has recently scaled back his ambitions.[12] Turkey believes it can leverage its existing and new trade relations to become a gas hub and is pushing its own gas exporting agenda to the EU. Although Turkey is trying to balance its relations with Europe and Russia, it`s becoming apparent that it will be difficult to build up such a hub without infringing on the interests of either Russia or the EU.

Following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, Central Asian countries seemed to be distancing themselves from Russia. But Moscow, with an understanding of the energy and social problems of these countries, is drawing them into ever closer cooperation—and perhaps, even greater dependence in the future. Facing severe gas deficit and winter blackouts, these countries will likely continue to buy Russian gas. In addition to cooperation with Azerbaijan and Turkmenistan, Russia is also focusing on Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. Agreements related to a tripartite gas union between Russia, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, proposed in November 2022 by Putin and involving the transportation of Russian gas through the territories of these countries,[13] are starting to materialize.[14] According to the officials, transit deliveries of Russian gas to Uzbekistan could reach up to 10 bcm per year.[15] Both Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan have obligations to supply gas to China and have significantly under-delivered in recent years due to domestic constraints. If Russian gas is supplied to Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan, at a favorable discount compared to the price of these countries’ exports to China, then Russia could somewhat make up for the loss of the EU market, while Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan could increase gas supplies to China, receiving much-needed export earnings.

Russia is simultaneously tightening ties with Iran—also struggling to monetize its gas reserves. In August 2023, Russia and Iran reached agreements on the creation of an energy hub, according to Majid Chegani, Iran’s deputy oil minister and general director of the National Iranian Gas Company.[16] The idea may be to deliver gas to Iran through Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan via the gas pipeline system “Central Asia – Center” using it in reverse mode and potentially via Azerbaijan.[17] This could lead to the implementation of a gas pipeline from Iran to Pakistan and India. Another possibility is for Iran to collaborate with evolving Russian competences in LNG plant construction. Although these plans sound farfetched and do not look economically feasible, they are important for Russia from a geopolitical point of view—and cannot be completely ruled out.

For years, the EU has supported the creation of SGC and has been looking at Caspian gas as a viable diversification option. However, with Russia working hard to reestablish its influence in the region, these supplies might come with increasing geopolitical risk.

The region is volatile, as shown most recently by Azerbaijan’s military offensive against Armenians in the breakaway region of Nagorno-Karabakh. Moreover, the countries participating in the SGC—Azerbaijan and potentially Turkmenistan—are authoritarian regimes lacking transparency.[18] Revenues from hydrocarbon exports are not used by the authorities to establish stable institutions. Instead, they primarily enrich the ruling elites.[19] This creates a risk that these countries may follow the path of other resource-based, unpredictable autocracies. Azerbaijan’s readiness to increase volumes through supplies from Russia and via Iran—while the Trans-Caspian is still in an early stage with questions about its future—adds additional risks to the expansion of SGC for the EU.

Despite the MoU signed by President Aliyev and president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen to double gas supplies from Azerbaijan by 2027, and Turkmenistan’s recent statement on its readiness to proceed with Trans-Caspian pipeline, the future expansion of the SGC remains uncertain.

It is questionable whether Azerbaijan can ensure the required gas volumes without increasing its reliance on Russia or Turkmenistan (via Iran or through a direct route). Participation of Turkmenistan is not guaranteed; challenges related to the financing of the Trans-Caspian project, as well as geopolitical tensions in Caspian remain in place.

The timing is critical; Europe needs this gas urgently, not in a decade’s time. In the next 2-3 years, substantial LNG volumes would become available globally, and by then the EU may have resolved its current energy supply crisis and moved further along on its energy transition path.

Still, the discussion on expanding supplies through the SGC will continue in the coming years, as the negotiating process itself is important for Azerbaijan, Turkmenistan, and Turkey from a geopolitical perspective.

[1] https://carnegieendowment.org/politika/88651

[2] https://www.stimson.org/2023/russia-iran-converge-in-attempt-to-build-a-new-eurasian-order/

[3] https://1prime.ru/state_regulation/20230120/839535364.html

[4] https://tdh.gov.tm/ru/post/34395/turkmenistan-rossiya-kurs-na-diversifikaciyu-dvustoronnego-partnyorstva

[5] https://www.politico.eu/article/turkey-special-relationship-russia-grow-recep-tayyip-erdogan-valdimir-putin/

[6] https://www.politico.eu/article/turkey-special-relationship-russia-grow-recep-tayyip-erdogan-valdimir-putin/

[7] https://www.osw.waw.pl/en/publikacje/osw-commentary/2023-03-10/turkeys-dream-a-hub-ankaras-wartime-gas-policy

[8] https://eurasianet.org/turkmenistan-smashing-time

[9] https://tass.com/economy/1556141

[10] https://www.dw.com/en/will-turkey-ever-become-a-russian-gas-hub/a-65053534

[11] https://www.reuters.com/business/energy/disagreements-delay-russian-gas-hub-plans-turkey-sources-2023-09-14/

[12] https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/turkeys-erdogan-says-country-could-part-ways-with-eu-if-necessary-2023-09-16/

[13] https://www.uzdaily.uz/ru/post/73735

[14] https://podrobno.uz/cat/uzbekistan-i-rossiya-dialog-partnerov-/gazovyy-soyuz-rossii-uzbekistana-i-kazakhstana-mozhet-rasshiritsya/

[15] https://www.rbc.ru/business/15/08/2023/64db4b429a79477e12def06c?from=newsfeed

[16] https://news.day.az/world/1587706.html

[17] https://itek.ru/analytics/trojstvennyj-gazovyj-sojuz/

[18] https://freedomhouse.org/explore-the-map?type=fiw&year=2023

[19]https://www.transparency.org/en/news/azerbaijani-laundromat-grand-corruption-and-how-to-buy-influence

The post Q&A | The Geopolitics of Caspian Gas – Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University SIPA | CGEP % first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.


Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

Gabon’s Coup Leader Asks for Sanctions Relief


Gabon’s coup leader, seeking an end to international sanctions, says he visited the Central African Republic on Thursday to explain to its president why he seized power from Gabon’s president on August 30.

Gen. Brice Clotaire Oligui Nguema, the coup leader, said he told CAR President Faustin-Archange Touadera that the military takeover was vital to free Gabon from a long, iron-fisted rule that failed to improve the living conditions of its civilians.

Nguema also said that the coup was intended to avoid bloodshed because, he said, Gabon’s opposition was preparing to take up arms to defend their victory that they say President Ali Bongo Ondimba stole in the August 26 election.

Touadera is the president of the Central African Economic and Monetary Community, or CEMAC, a regional economic bloc with Cameroon, Chad, CAR, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and Congo as members.

He also was appointed by the 11-member Economic Community of Central African States, or ECCAS, to mediate Gabon’s transition to constitutional order. ECCAS includes all the CEMAC nations as well as Angola, Burundi, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Rwanda and Sao Tome and Principe.

CEMAC and ECCAS suspended Gabon’s membership after the coup and condemned the use of force to resolve political conflicts.

Nguema said his trip to CAR, after visiting Equatorial Guinea and Congo, was aimed at requesting the lifting of international sanctions, which were imposed to press for a return to democratic rule in Gabon.

The military junta needs time to restore stability, ensure sustainable economic development, conduct a national dialogue and revise the electoral code before organizing transparent and fair elections to usher in civilian rule, Nguema said.

He said Gabon citizens generally support the military for seizing power without bloodshed from Ali Bongo, who took power in 2009 following the death of his father, who had led the central African country since 1967.

CAR state TV showed crowds of Gabon citizens anxious to see Nguema during his visit. Some carried placards congratulating the junta leader for what they called his courage to save Gabon from the Bongo family’s nearly 60-year rule that failed to develop the oil-producing nation.

Rigobert Antah, who was among those gathered, told Gabon state TV that he is ready to return to Libreville after spending seven years in exile in CAR’s capital, Bangui.

He said he was declared wanted by Gabon’s government in 2016 for protesting when Ali Bongo claimed he had scored 49.8% of votes to narrowly defeat challenger Jean Ping, who had 48.2% of votes in that year’s presidential election.

Antah said he would be grateful if the military junta hands power to civilian rule within a maximum of two years.

Nguema did not say how much time he thinks he needs to return to constitutional rule. The military junta says it will invite Gabon’s citizens in exile for a national dialogue but did not say when the dialogue would take place.

Nguema promised to open an embassy in CAR to take care of the needs of Gabon’s citizens there.

The African Union and the United Nations also imposed sanctions to exert pressure on Nguema to hand power to civilians. France, China, Russia, the United Kingdom, Canada and the United States also expressed concerns about the military junta taking over and asked for a return to normalcy.

The post Gabon’s Coup Leader Asks for Sanctions Relief first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.


Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

VOA Newscasts


Give us 5 minutes, and we’ll give you the world. Around the clock, Voice of America keeps you in touch with the latest news. We bring you reports from our correspondents and interviews with newsmakers from across the world.

The post VOA Newscasts first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.


Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

UN To Investigate Attack on Ukrainian Village of Hroza


A team of eight human rights monitors, including the head of the U.N. Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine, has left for the small village of Hroza in northeastern Ukraine, the site of an apparent Russian missile attack Thursday that killed at least 52 people and injured several others.

The team will arrive Saturday to gather information and collect possible evidence of gross violations of international humanitarian and human rights law that might amount to war crimes. 

“According to local authorities, 52 people were killed when what appeared to be a Russian missile struck a cafe in the village, where people had gathered for a wake,” said Liz Throssell, spokesperson for the U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights.

“The appalling scenes from the village of Hroza in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine underscore once again the terrible price civilians are paying 20 months after Russia’s invasion,” she said.

Throssell noted that so far colleagues in the Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine have established the names of 35 people who were killed.  

They include 19 women, 15 men, an eight-year-old boy and the names of five women and one man who were injured.  According to authorities, Throssell said, “One Ukrainian soldier who was attending his father’s funeral was among those killed.”

“What is clear is that the strike is one of the deadliest since 24 February 2022, but of course it is far from being the only one,” she said. “The appalling scenes from the village of Hroza in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine underscore once again the terrible price civilians are paying 20 months after Russia’s invasion.”

This is borne out in a U.N. report published Wednesday on the human rights situation in Ukraine. 

The U.N. Human Rights Monitoring Mission in the country observed that “civilians continue to pay a horrendous price in the war in Ukraine, with nearly 10,000 dead and tens of thousands injured since conflict began in February 2022.”

Danielle Bell, the mission’s head, noted that “in just six months covered by this report, more than 1,000 civilians died and nearly four thousand were injured.”

Spokesperson Throssell said U.N. High Commissioner for Human Rights Volker Türk is profoundly shocked by the horrific impact of such strikes and condemns the killings.  

“He has deployed a field team to the site to speak to survivors and gather more information,” she said, noting the importance of having people on the ground “piecing together information that will allow them to establish more about what actually occurred in this village.”

She said she did not know whether there were any military targets in the area.  

“That is something that we cannot really establish right now.  But I think what is clear is that this was a village, with a small community,” said Throssell.

“Before the Russian invasion, the village’s population was about 300.  It is not clear how many residents were still living there, but with the high number of people killed, everybody in this small community has been affected,” she said.

The Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs or OCHA said Denise Brown, the humanitarian coordinator in Ukraine, was also traveling to Hroza.

“She also condemned this horrific attack that caused significant death and damage to the village of Hroza,” said Jens Laerke, OCHA deputy spokesperson.  “She is on her way to the location…to see for herself what has happened and what kind of support the U.N. humanitarian system and our partners can provide.

“We know already that yesterday; some NGOs were able to get there.  Other agencies, NGOs, and U.N. agencies are mobilizing relief to get it there.  I am told that that includes things such as non-food items, shelter maintenance kits, cash, hygiene materials as well as mental health and psycho-social support,” said Laerke.

U.N. Secretary-General Antonio Gutteres strongly condemned the attack on the village of Hroza in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine. 

“Attacks against civilians and civilian infrastructure are prohibited under international humanitarian law and they must stop immediately,” he said in a statement Thursday.

The post UN To Investigate Attack on Ukrainian Village of Hroza first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.


Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

Mauritius High Court Decriminalizes Same-Sex Relations


The Supreme Court in the East African island nation of Mauritius has struck down a colonial-era law outlawing same-sex relations, a rare move at time when nations on the continent have passed strict anti-gay or LGBTQ laws.

The court ruled in two cases that were brought by individuals with the support of LGBTQ rights groups, who challenged the law that was established in 1898 under British colonial rule that made “sodomy” or consensual sex between two men a jailable offense. 

In both cases, the country’s Supreme Court ruled the prohibition on consensual same-sex relations is discriminatory and in breach of provisions in the constitution.  

The court said the law, Section 250 in the nation’s criminal code, “was not introduced in Mauritius to reflect any Indigenous Mauritian values but was inherited as part of our colonial history from Britain. Its enactment was not the expression of domestic democratic will, but was a course imposed on Mauritius and other colonies by British rule.”

The ruling was praised by the United Nations, as well as LGBTQ and human rights groups. Human Rights watch urged the Mauritius government to pass laws and adopt policies to ensure the rights of LGBTQ people are protected. 

The ruling goes against a trend seen in recent months in Africa. Earlier this year, Uganda passed what is considered the harshest anti-gay law in the world, making what it calls “aggravated homosexuality” a potentially capital offence with penalties that include life in prison.

The United Nations reports 66 nations have laws which criminalize same-sex relations, and more than half of them are in Africa.

Some information for this report was provided by Reuters and Agence France-Presse.

The post Mauritius High Court Decriminalizes Same-Sex Relations first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.


Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

“Granada annulled the 2020 trilateral declaration”. Opinion from Yerevan


Outcome of the quadripartite meeting in Granada

“The statement adopted at the end of the quadripartite meeting held in Granada annulled the November 9, 2020 trilateral document signed by the leaders of Armenia, Azerbaijan and Russia at the end of hostilities in Karabakh,” political analyst Gurgen Simonyan believes.

He explains that the text of the Granada statement “recognizes the legitimacy of the countries’ services and laws in relation to their sovereign territories, while the November document implied the presence of Russian special services – Russia’s FSB – on them.”

The day before, Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan, French President Emmanuel Macron, German Chancellor Olaf Scholz and European Council President Charles Michel held a quadrilateral meeting in Granada, within the framework of the third summit of the European Political Community.

Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev refused to participate in the meeting, citing France’s biased position. In addition, he proposed to invite the Turkish president, which was opposed by Paris and Berlin.

Main provisions of the statement adopted in Granada, as well as a commentary by an Armenian political scientist.

Provisions of the statement adopted in Granada

European Council President Charles Michel, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Olaf Scholz

  • emphasized their unwavering support for the independence, sovereignty, territorial integrity and inviolability of Armenia’s borders,
  • expressed their support for the strengthening of EU-Armenia relations in all dimensions, based on the needs of the Republic of Armenia,
  • agreed on the need to provide additional humanitarian assistance to Armenia, as the latter is facing the consequences of the recent mass resettlement of the Armenians of Nagorno-Karabakh,
  • emphasized that these refugees should be able to freely exercise their right to return to their homes and places of residence unconditionally, under international supervision and with due respect for their history, culture and human rights,
  • expressed their commitment to all efforts aimed at the normalization of relations between Armenia and Azerbaijan on the basis of mutual recognition of the sovereignty, inviolability of borders and territorial integrity of Armenia (29,800 km2) and Azerbaijan (86,600 km2),
  • called for strict observance of the principle of non-use of force and threat of use of force,
  • emphasized the urgent need to work on the delimitation of the border on the basis of the USSR General Staff maps provided to the sides, which should also be the basis for the withdrawal of forces, the finalization of the peace treaty and the resolution of all humanitarian issues,
  • called for the opening of all borders, including the border between Armenia and Turkey, as well as the opening of regional communications on the basis of full respect for the sovereignty and jurisdiction of the countries, as well as on the basis of the principle of equality and reciprocity,
  • called for the release of all detainees and for cooperation to resolve the fate of the missing and to facilitate demining efforts.

Commentary

Political analyst Gurgen Simonyan believes Armenia could not have “favorable positions” in the negotiations after its defeat in the 44-day war in 2020.

“It can only count on relatively convenient realities, but Azerbaijan demands much more. Armenia is trying to secure for itself the territories of the Armenian SSR that were under its control during the Soviet Union. But Azerbaijan disputes this too,” he said, commenting on the issue of border demarcation and the map on which it should be carried out.

The political analyst believes that the participation of the Armenian delegation in the meeting in Granada, as opposed to the boycott by Azerbaijan, shows that Armenia has a more constructive position and is ready to promote the peace agenda.

According to Gurgen Simonyan’s assessment, it can be stated that Azerbaijan has always set itself the goal of not only achieving the desired solution to the Nagorno-Karabakh issue, but has also pursued and is pursuing “a policy of complete disintegration, destruction of Armenia’s sovereignty. And this makes all the adopted agreements “untenable and impossible”.

“We need to realize that for peace two sides are needed, and for war one is enough. If they boycott this agenda, the situation will become even more aggravated.”

Referring to the provisions of the statement on Nagorno-Karabakh, the political analyst noted that it uses the terms “mass resettlement” and “refugees.”

“This means that they were deprived of their homeland, subjected to patriocide, which is a phenomenon containing elements of genocide. In the future, Azerbaijan may be accused of committing genocide, and the Kosovo version may work here”.

According to Simonyan, in the current situation the return of NK Armenians to their homeland, to their homes seems unrealistic, but it may eventually become possible.

“If it is possible to send a peacekeeping mission to Artsakh under the auspices of the UN, if the Berdzor corridor [Lachin corridor] operates unhindered, if the border zones are demilitarized, it is not excluded that they will return,” he explained.

When asked by JAMnews what we can expect from the “strengthening of EU-Armenia relations” and “preparation of a joint EU-US event” announced by European Commission head Ursula von der Leyen after her meeting with Pashinyan, the political analyst said:

“We can expect a strategic reversal [of Armenia’s foreign policy vector]. We should realize that Armenia has no alternative. It is necessary to break military-political and economic ties with all hostile parties and try to structure new realities based on our national security.”

According to him, by ratifying the Rome Statute, Armenia showed itself as befits a sovereign state, acting in its national interests. And it was “a much more serious step than leaving Russia’s CSTO military bloc.”

“We are talking about a political and legal U-turn. Now the withdrawal from the Russian CSTO and EAEU blocs are just a consequential, subsequent important step to be taken,” he said.

On October 5, the Armenian Prime Minister also met with the President of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen in Granada. Following the meeting, a joint statement was adopted, which also states that “in the long term, the European Union and Armenia are determined to strengthen their economic ties”. Ursula von der Leyen informed Nikol Pashinyan about “the preparation of a joint EU-US event in support of Armenia”.

Follow us Twitter | Facebook | Instagram

Outcome of the quadripartite meeting in Granada

The post “Granada annulled the 2020 trilateral declaration”. Opinion from Yerevan first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.


Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

U.S. Warns E.U.’s Landmark AI Policy Will Only Benefit Big Tech


GERMANY-G7-SUMMIT

The US warned the European Union that its proposed law to regulate artificial intelligence would favor companies with the resources to cover the costs of compliance while hurting smaller firms, according to previously undisclosed documents.

The US analysis focuses mostly on the European Parliament version of the AI Act, which includes rules on generative AI. Some rules in the parliament law are based on terms that are “vague or undefined,” according to the documents, which were obtained by Bloomberg News.

[time-brightcove not-tgx=”true”]

The analysis is Washington’s most detailed position on the EU legislation that could set the tone for other countries writing rules for AI. One US concern is that the European Parliament focuses on how AI models are developed, whereas the US would prefer an approach that focuses on the risk involved in how these models are actually used.

The analysis warns that EU regulations risk “dampening the expected boost to productivity and potentially leading to a migration of jobs and investment to other markets.” 

The new rules would also likely hamper “investment in AI R&D and commercialization in the EU, limiting the competitiveness of European firms,” because training large language models is resource-intensive, it said.

The US State Department feedback, including a line-by-line edit of certain provisions in the law, was shared with European counterparts in recent weeks, according to people familiar with the matter who asked not to be identified discussing private documents. 

One of the people said the comments were offered in the spirit of cooperation and alignment of values. Some of the US concerns have been echoed by EU member countries in response to the European Parliament version, the person said. 

The State Department and the European Commission declined to comment.

The EU Parliament’s AI Act, which lawmakers voted on in June, would require more transparency about the source material used to train the large language models that underpin most generative AI products. That vote cleared the way for negotiations among parliament, the European Commission and member states, and officials hope to have a deal by the end of the year for the final rules.

The US analysis is in keeping with the State Department’s calls for a more hands-off approach to the technology so as not to stifle innovation. Secretary of State Antony Blinken objected to a number of the EU Parliament’s proposals to control generative AI during a meeting with commission officials in Sweden at the end of May.

At the same time, Washington has given mixed messages to EU policymakers about its views on regulation. While the US pushed back when the commission first proposed the AI Act in 2021, some American officials have begun to view mandatory rules more favorably as AI developers and ethicists warn about the possible harms from the technology.

Aaron Cooper, head of global policy at BSA The Software Alliance, a trade group that has engaged with both US and EU officials regarding AI regulation, said it’s important for countries’ AI rules to agree on basics, including definitions. 

“The most important thing that the Biden administration can do is continue to have a good candid conversation with their European counterparts about what the objectives are for AI policy,” Cooper said.

The post U.S. Warns E.U.’s Landmark AI Policy Will Only Benefit Big Tech first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.


Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

Canaanites gradually moved from the ‘Near East’ to the Southern Levant


28934148-0-image-a-17_1590678460204.jpg

Published: 16:03 BST, 28 May 2020 | Updated: 19:29 BST, 28 May 2020

The ancient Canaanite community mentioned in the Bible were a distinct population that migrated from the ‘Near East’ to the Southern Levant over several centuries, new DNA analysis reveals. 

Canaanites lived in the Southern Levant – which is now Israel, the Palestinian Authority, Jordan and Lebanon – between 3,500 and 1,150 BC.

They lived in various townships and, previously, their genetic make-up and ancestry was not well understood.

But a new study has confirmed that they were genetically different to anyone else seen in the world. 

An international team of researchers has found they were descended from a combination of two main groups of people: Neolithic inhabitants of the Levant and populations related to Copper Age Iranians, specifically the region of the Zagros Mountains, and Bronze Age people from Caucasus.

Over hundreds of years, Canaanites migrated from the Ancient Near East – what is now modern Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan – into the Southern Levant.

Modern-day inhabitants share much of this Canaanite DNA, as only at three points in the last 4,000 years has an external influence penetrated the gene pool. 

The three points were monumental in world history and are: the beginning of the Iron Age (1,000BC); the arrival of Alexander the Great (from 330BC); and the domination of the Ottoman Empire (1516AD). 

Scroll down for video  

The Canaanite populations did not remain static over time. Instead, they migrated slowly, over hundreds of years, from the Ancient Near East, what is now modern Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, into the Southern Levant (pictured)

Two studies have found Canaanites were a secular people, rarely breeding with outsiders, and were descended from two main lineages: Neolithic inhabitants of the Levant and populations related to Bronze Age Iranians and people from Caucasus.pictured, one of the study sites in Israel 

A host of researchers from all around the world analysed the remains of 93 individuals who lived over 1,500 years, at nine different sites in the Levant. 

It revealed that the Canaanites do represent a clear group and, despite being from various locations, are closely related.  

‘The Canaanites, albeit living in different city-states, were culturally and genetically similar,’ says Liran Carmel of The Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

The findings reveal that most of the Canaanites’ genetics was inherited from a mixture of local Neolithic populations and people from Copper-Age Iran and the Bronze Age Caucasus — modern-day Armenia, Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Russia. 

Dr Carmel adds: ‘In addition, this region has witnessed many later population movements, with people coming from the northeast, from the south, and from the northwest.

‘Individuals from all sites are highly genetically similar, albeit with subtle differences, showing that the archaeologically and historically defined “Canaanites” corresponds to a demographically coherent group.’ 

This, they say, is proof that the Southern Levant saw a gradual and continuous stream of migration from the Near East. 

Canaanites migrated slowly, over hundreds of years, from the Ancient Near East, what is now modern Georgia, Armenia, and Azerbaijan, into the Southern Levant. Pictured, one of the study sites 

An ancient 3,200-year-old Canaanite temple has been discovered in Israel which was part of a biblical city destroyed by Joshua.  

Inside, archaeologists found various statues of different gods, including two bronze figurines said to be ‘smiting’. 

The temple, from about the 12th century BC, was once part of the powerful Canaanite city of Lachish. 

This city was mentioned in the book of Joshua, with Lachish supposedly delivered by God into the hands of Israel, where ‘[they] put it and all the people in it to the sword’. 

Archaeologists from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem and Southern Adventist University in Tennessee say this is a ‘unique opportunity’ to study the Canaanite’s. 

The Late Bronze Age temple had two pillars and two towers leading to a large rectangular hall – unusual for the period, according to Professor Yosef Garfinkel. 

They found a host of other objects in the temple, including two bronze figurines said to be armed ‘smiting gods’ – housed near the altar.

‘The settlement is mentioned in both the Bible and in various Egyptian sources and was one of the few Canaanite cities to survive into the 12th century BCE,’ Hebrew University explained in a statement. 

The layout was common in the earlier Bronze Age and similar to bible descriptions of the First Temple in Jerusalem said to have been built by King Solomon.

It was a rare discovery for the researchers – who say a find along these lines and of this scale only happens every few decades. 

‘The strength of the migration from the northeast of the Ancient Near East, and the fact that this migration continued for many centuries, may help to explain why rulers of city-states in Canaan in the Late Bronze Age carry non-Semitic, Hurrian names,’ says Shai Carmi of The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. 

‘There were strong and active connections between these regions through movements of people that help to understand the shared elements of culture.’ 

When compared to modern inhabitants of the region, the scientists said 50 per cent of the ancestry of Canaanites comes from the Caucasus and the Zagros Mountains. 

An unknown proportion comes from the local Neolithic inhabitants of the Southern Levant and a smaller, but also unknown proportion from both Europe and Africa. 

It is unknown when African and European genes first made it into the genomes of modern-day inhabitants of the Levant.   

The Near East has been a tumultuous region over the last 4,000 years, with innumerable conflicts and invasions. 

However, 19 of the 93 skeletons used in the aforementioned research were also studied by a separate team of scientists. 

They found that, despite a range of almost 4,000 years, the ancestry of the skeletons was largely the same. 

In fact, the researchers say that only three events had a significant impact on the gene pool of modern-day Lebanese people.    

The Levant has been ruled by Egyptians, Babylonians, Assyrians, Persians, Greeks, Romans, Crusaders, Arabs, and Ottomans in its extensive history, but the genes of modern-day residents of Beirut were 90 per cent similar to ancestors who lived around 4,000 years ago.

Even one of the most recent invaders, the Crusaders, have left barely a mark on the genetics of the Levant. 

Dr Marc Haber, first author from the University of Birmingham and previously from the Wellcome Sanger Institute, said: ‘We revealed a genetic history of the area across 4,000 years, with a time-point approximately every 500 years. 

‘This showed us that despite the huge cultural changes that were occurring during this period, there were only a few times that the genetics of the general population changed enough to affect the ordinary people.’

The first study was published in Cell Press and the second study is today available in the American Journal of Human Genetics. 

The post Canaanites gradually moved from the ‘Near East’ to the Southern Levant first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.


Categories
The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com

Police Detain Azerbaijani Opposition Leader After Fundraiser


2D31C639-5BE8-4011-9A8C-42F07D743AB4_w12

BAKU — Police in Baku briefly detained the leader of the opposition Popular Front Party of Azerbaijan (AXCP), Ali Karimli, before letting him go amid allegations he was trying to undermine public stability.

Opposition politician Tofiq Yaqublu told RFE/RL that police detained Karimli on June 28 as he was leaving an event in the capital to raise money to help activists in the former Soviet republic pay fines resulting from what they call bogus charges.

Police officials gave no explanation for Karimli’s detainment, but Yaqublu said the authorities were trying to disrupt the fundraising event organized at the headquarters of the opposition Musavat party. Critics of longtime President Ilham Aliyev’s government say authorities of the oil-rich South Caucasus nation frequently seek to silence dissent by jailing reporters, human-rights activists, and civil-society advocates without grounds. Dozens of AXCP members have been arrested, and some imprisoned, in recent years on what their supporters have called trumped-up charges.

Aliyev denies any rights abuses. He took power in 2003 shortly before the death of his father, Heydar Aliyev, a former KGB officer and communist-era leader who had ruled Azerbaijan since 1993.

The post Police Detain Azerbaijani Opposition Leader After Fundraiser first appeared on The News And Times – thenewsandtimes.com.