Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: RT @visegrad24: Looks like the Russians have started torturing the alleged Moscow attackers. Are those electric cables going where it look…



Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: Атака на «Крокус»: что не так с террористами, странности и несостыковки https://t.co/hqwWyQoL5S Группа террористов была „расходником“. Их не было смысла готовить как профессиональную команду. Скорее всего, никто из заказчиков теракта даже не рассчитывал, что террористам удастся…



Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: Атака на «Крокус»: что не так с террористами, странности и несостыковки https://t.co/hqwWyQoL5S



Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: How Biden Plans to Stop Trump From Stealing the Election https://t.co/WvvtKQvpFH



Categories
Michael Novakhov's favorite articles

Biden Is Building a ‘Superstructure’ to Stop Trump From Stealing the Election


biden-campaign-prepping.jpg?crop=0px%2C1

For years, Donald Trump has made it abundantly clear that if he doesn’t win the 2024 presidential election, he is willing to cheat and steal it. Since President Joe Biden’s inaugural address, according to sources with intimate knowledge of the situation, Biden and his inner circle have been drawing up meticulous plans and creating a large legal network focused on wargaming a close election finish, in which the former president and Republican Party launch a scorched-earth, Big Liefueled crusade.

Long before Trump began leading in battleground-state polling — and years before he was a declared 2024 candidate — the ex-president and many of his influential allies were already busy plotting ways to tilt the election in his favor. These yearslong efforts, conducted both secretly and out in the open, have already yielded tangible results for Trump and the conservative election denier movement. These wide-ranging operations have alarmed the Democratic Party elite, who aren’t just worried about Biden’s sagging poll numbers. Numerous Democratic lawmakers, operatives, Biden campaign advisers, and administration officials tell Rolling Stone that if the president does ultimately beat Trump this November, the election will be exceedingly close.

Over the past year, Team Biden has been conducting war games, crafting complex legal strategies, and devoting extensive resources to prepare for, as one former senior Biden administration official puts it, “all-hell-breaks-loose” scenarios. The preparations include planning for a contingency in which Biden’s margin of victory is so razor-thin that Trump and the GOP launch a tidal wave of legal challenges and political maneuvers to rerun his 2020 election strategy: declare victory anyways, and try to will it into existence.

“President Biden has been worried, for a while now, that Donald Trump is going to try to steal the election, if it’s very close on Election Day,” says a source familiar with Biden’s thinking. “If that ends up being the case, we are… also expecting the Republican Party to go into overdrive to help him steal it. We are continuing to build out the infrastructure to ensure that doesn’t happen — again — if President Biden wins and Trump and MAGA Republicans try to confuse [everyone] and sow chaos.”

After the 2020 race was called for Biden, Trump and much of the GOP embarked on a sprawling campaign — a blitz of lawsuits, rabid conspiracy theories, attempts to block certification, and slates of fake electors — to nullify Biden’s clear win. This culminated in the deadly Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capitol, which Trump instigated, and led to years of criminal investigations and various indictments, as well as the mainstreaming of the MAGA election-denial movement. The efforts to overturn the election were unsuccessful, largely because Biden had won too many battleground states — unlike when the 2000 presidential race came down to the single state of Florida, and the Republican Party was able to successfully halt the recount of an extremely close vote.

This time around, the race could be much closer, and Trump’s efforts appear significantly more organized. He also has more of the party’s elite behind him and his anti-democratic election lies than he had during the last presidential election. If the 2024 election margins end up being wafer-thin, that level of institutional backing could, of course, redound to Trump’s benefit.

Top officials in both the Trump and Biden camps are expecting an uncomfortably tight election outcome in November, sources in both campaigns have told Rolling Stone on numerous occasions over the past year. Advisers to both candidates say they expect the race will turn on a margin of just tens of thousands of votes in a handful of key battleground states, if not a single state. One Trump adviser says that they had privately told the ex-president and presumptive 2024 GOP nominee to anticipate an electoral “knife fight to the death” on, and likely in the wake of, Election Day.

Team Biden’s in-house counsels and network of outside lawyers are currently preparing legal strategies for scenarios involving recounts that would make, in the words of one Biden official, “make Florida in 2000 look like child’s play.”

Sources in and around the president’s legal and political operations say the Biden campaign’s current wargaming is informed by questions aides asked themselves in the wake of the 2020 election: What if there’s a rematch in four years with Donald Trump? What do we do if Joe Biden wins and Trump tries to steal the election again? 

Bidenworld spent a lot of time pondering such a scenario even before the 2020 election.

In the months leading up to November 2020, Trump offered repeated, public signals that he would try to delegitimize any outcome in which he lost the election. As the threats mounted, Biden’s campaign brass began preemptively working through different nightmare scenarios.

That prep work accelerated in the final weeks of the campaign as an armada of lawyers, numbering in the hundreds, sketched out various unconventional scenarios in which the then-president tried to cling to power in the face of defeat, according to current and former senior Biden campaign officials.

Democratic aides walked through a range of authoritarian possibilities, including one scenario in which Trump called out the National Guard either as a show of force or in an attempt to enforce his fictitious victory, the sources say. Another scenario involved gameplans for how to handle Trump refusing to leave the White House the day of Biden’s inauguration, even if the swearing-in had already concluded.

“Biden HQ and the lawyers were essentially preparing for every insane scenario that anyone could think of, so that the campaign wouldn’t be stuck in neutral if the worst actually transpired,” says one attorney familiar with the extensive 2020 wargaming. “Even then, I’m not sure everybody was predicting just how crazy it would become and what Trump would actually do.”

Any attempt by Trump to try and undermine the 2024 election would likely look different than 2020, if only because he lacks the legal authority and access to federal resources he enjoyed as president.

Still, Team Biden has been planning for years sketching out what Trump could do as the leader of the GOP, and has partnered with the Democratic National Committee and a vast network of liberal attorneys and legal groups to conduct similar doomsday-style wargaming.

One swing-state Democratic election official involved with these efforts refers to it as a “superstructure” of various legal teams and liberal operatives who “are going to fight [Team Trump and election deniers] on all fronts and let them have it from all sides, if MAGA wants to tear down our democracy.”

According to two Biden campaign officials and two other sources with knowledge of the operation, draft pleadings and legal motions, for all kinds of possible Trump-related emergencies, are already written and at the ready. In critical swing states such as Georgia, Arizona, and Pennsylvania, Team Biden is regularly in contact with an array of outside counsels and local law firms that have been retained to actively monitor what is happening on the ground, including with regards to the activism of election-denying Trump allies. 

Bidenworld’s closely-held list of nightmare scenarios — in which Democratic legal teams would have to battle it out tooth and nail with Republican counterparts before, during, or after Election Day 2024 — has grown “comically long,” says one source with direct knowledge of the matter. Biden campaign officials and other Democrats familiar with the topic tell Rolling Stone that a key concern, for which step-by-step gameplanning has already begun, is how to robustly respond if Trump and other leading Republicans try to engineer another Jan. 6-style power grab.

In these internal wargames among Bidenworld and Democratic attorneys in key states, this kind of Jan. 6 sequel has included scripts in which House Republicans or state officials refuse to certify a Biden victory — an act that prominent GOP politicians, including on Capitol Hill, have publicly dangled as an option.

A spokesperson for the Democratic National Committee tells Rolling Stone that the national party is also setting aside “tens of millions of dollars in a robust voter protection program to safeguard the rights of voters to make their voices heard against relentless attacks from Donald Trump and the GOP.”

“Meanwhile, the Trump campaign and the RNC have invested in an army of conspiratorial, election-denying legal staff to undermine our elections and make it harder for Americans’ ballots to be counted,” says the DNC spokesperson. “We won’t let Republicans get away with these baseless attacks on our democracy, and we will continue to use every tool at our disposal to strengthen our democracy as MAGA extremists attempt to tear it down.”

Of course, if much of the current national and swing-state polling holds, Trump could defeat his successor outright in a 2024 rematch. However, that is almost irrelevant to Trump and his MAGA brain trust’s goals of cementing their “heads I win, tails you lose” philosophy of election administration

Trump, after all, has continued to falsely claim that the 2016 presidential race was somehow “rigged” in Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton’s favor. And that was the election he won.


Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: RT @Newsweek: Russia’s huge Black Sea Fleet losses after two more ships hit https://t.co/F0CI9FoeD5 https://t.co/rQZdIp9qkz



Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: RT @GermanyDiplo: #TwoStateSolution: We strongly condemn the announcement to confiscate over 800 hectares of land in the Palestinian Territ…



Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: Moscow mass shooting and October 7 massacre: Similarities and differences



Categories
Michael Novakhov's favorite articles

Moscow mass shooting and October 7 massacre: Similarities and differences – analysis


586850

 After the terror attack at the Crocus City Hall during a concert west of Moscow killed more than 130 people, Russia is observing a national day of mourning. Video footage from the attack show men in military-style gear massacring civilians. Russia says it has arrested the four attackers.

The attack in Moscow is similar to many other ISIS and other extremist attacks around the world, most like the November 2015 Bataclan attack in Paris, the 2008 Mumbai attacks, the Westgate Mall attack in Kenya, and also the Moscow theater siege in 2002.

It also reminds us of the October 7 attack. Like October 7, this involved several armed men murdering civilians. The videos show the same adoration of massacre in the eyes of the killers as they seem to enjoy machine-gunning people who are trying to flee.

In general, it is there that the similarities to October 7 end. This is because the reaction of the world has been completely different to the attack in Moscow and the attack in Israel. When hundreds of Hamas terrorists committed a similar massacre in Israel, many of the countries that have condemned the attack in Russia, did not condemn the attack in Israel. For instance, Russia, China, Iran, Qatar, Turkey and many other countries that condemned the Moscow attack did not condemn the October 7 attack. In fact many of those countries have sought to justify the October 7 attack. There is also a major campaign of denial about the Hamas crimes of October 7. For instance an Algerian senator recently denied the Hamas sexual assaults that took place on October 7. In the Moscow attack the attackers did not commit sexual assault, so there is no comparison in that regard.

When it comes to condemnation that is one level in which we can see the hypocrisy of the world. This hypocrisy is not total. Many western countries did condemn the attack on Israel and also condemned the attack on Russia.

Smoke rises above the Crocus City Hall concert venue following a reported shooting incident, on the outskirts of Moscow, Russia, March 22, 2024. (credit: STRINGER/ REUTERS)

Now it’s important to look at several other contrasts. The attack on Russia has spawned rumors of conspiracies.

Some on social media have claimed the attack was a “false flag” while others have asserted that ISIS may have been “hired” for the attack. These voices present ISIS as a tool of some other terrorists’ agenda.

Usually these types of conspiracy theorists claim ISIS is linked to the US, or even to Israel. In essence you have a whole echo chamber of people who not only deny the October 7 attack, but then claim Israel is behind the attack on Russia. For these people Israel is always to blame for everything, and any attack on Israel is always denied, or excused and justified. While it may seem that these conspiracies are marginal, they tend to infect a swath of the far-right and far-left online. Some of the accounts that push them have hundreds of thousands of followers.

Another contrast between the attack on Russia and the attack on Israel is the intelligence warning provided by the West to Russia before the attack. According to reports Moscow was warned about a threat, Israel was not warned.

Hosting Hamas vs. ISIS

Why wasn’t Israel warned about October 7? Hamas is labeled a terrorist group by the US and some other countries.

However, Hamas is also hosted Qatar, a major non-NATO ally in the Middle East. In addition Turkey, a member of NATO, hosts Hamas members. This means two of the West’s closest allies host Hamas. The West may not have gotten wind of the Hamas plans because their allies are hosting the group. In essence this means Israel gets less warning than Russia, and then less support after attacks. Western countries and their allies do not host terrorist groups that attack Russia.

Hamas is not just hosted, but it has been systematically empowered and enriched via Western allies. Hamas took over Gaza unilaterally in 2007, after committing crimes against the Western-backed Palestinian Authority. However, oddly, Western countries then consented to Qatar hosting Hamas. From 2007 Hamas expanded exponentially in terms of its arsenal. While the West fought ISIS and terror groups that target Russia, the West enabled their allies to empower Hamas. Tragically, the result was October 7.

AFTER OCTOBER 7 Hamas is still hosted by Western allies. This means that Hamas is not being fully condemned in the West, but is treated sort of like the Taliban was for many years, it is kept at arms length, being made ready to return to power. The Taliban was brought to power in Afghanistan to push away the western-backed government in Kabul. It’s not clear whether in a few years the same may not happen with Hamas brought to the West Bank. What is clear is that in contrast to the many countries that would never back terror against Russia, it is considered normal to have Hamas hosted throughout many countries in the Middle East, including the closest allies of the West.

Russia’s response to the terror attack has not yet become clear. Because ISIS does not control an area that can be targeted, it may be hard for Russia to respond. Some have suggested that Russia will find another scapegoat, such as Ukraine. Several commentators have wondered whether the international community will back a Russian response, similar to Israel’s in Gaza. Those who make this comparison assert that a large number of civilians have been killed in Gaza, and suggest a Russian response like that would not be accepted. However, others point out that, in contrast to Israel, no one is calling for an immediate “ceasefire” by Moscow against terrorists.

When we look at the attacks on Russia and Israel, the similarities are clear when it comes to the methods of the terrorists and the consequences to the victims. The victims were massacred. The murderous gunmen felt they could massacre civilians with impunity. Hamas and ISIS have the same murderous methods. However, no hostages were taken in Moscow and apparently no sexual assault.

The similarities end here, because Hamas is backed by Western allies and ISIS is not hosted by Western allies. Too many countries did not condemn the Hamas attack on October 7, whereas most of the world has condemned the attack on Russia. Moscow received advanced warning of a potential attack, but no one warned Israel. Israel faces more hurdles before defeating Hamas in Gaza, because of international demands for a ceasefire and for Hamas to be allowed to remain in Rafah and control aid, whereas Russia can act without restraint if it can overcome the hurdle presented by the fact that ISIS doesn’t clearly control any terrain today. 


Categories
(@mikenov) / Twitter

@mikenov: https://t.co/mtLyQBHZlV – The Crocus Attack #NewsAndTimes #NT #TNT #News #Times #World #USA #POTUS #DOJ #FBI #CIA #DIA #ODNI #Israel #Mossad #Netanyahu #Ukraine #NewAbwehr #OSINT #Putin #Russia #GRU #Путин, #Россия #SouthCaucasus #Bloggers https://t.co/O0SIgLVWzM…