Speculation Swirls About What Hit Trump. An Analysis Suggests It was a Bullet – The New York Times https://t.co/iY9prBjexl pic.twitter.com/5YGNTw3qTo
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) July 28, 2024
Day: July 28, 2024
Millar Maadad al-Shaar, 10
Alma Ayman Fakhr al-Din, 11
Naji Taher Halabi, 11
Yazan Naif Abu Salah, 12
Izil Nashat Ayoub, 12
Finis Adham Safadi, 12
John Wadie Ibrahim, 13
Hazem Akram Abu Salah, 15
Fajr Laith Abu Salah, 16
Amir Rabi Abu Salah, 16
Nazem Fakher Saeb… pic.twitter.com/GQ3ElGYvQk
— Israel Defense Forces (@IDF) July 28, 2024
Images may be subject to copyright. Learn More
My opinion: this NYT article on “visual analysis” is a phony-baloney and the deliberately published piece of disinformation, aimed to skew and mislead the investigation, and it did.
I recommend to the Counterintelligence Services (maybe as the combined group) to assess and investigate this article and the related issues very carefully. The help from specialists is needed.
–
Speculation Swirls About What Hit Trump. An Analysis Suggests It was a Bullet – The New York Times nytimes.com/2024/07/26/us/
–
Quote: “The model and the trajectory analysis show that the bullet traveled in a straight line from the gunman to the bleachers, clipping Mr. Trump on its path.”
I recommend to the Counterintelligence Services (maybe as the combined group) to assess and investigate this article and the related issues very carefully. The help from specialists is needed.
–
Speculation Swirls About What Hit Trump. An Analysis Suggests It was a Bullet – The New York Times nytimes.com/2024/07/26/us/
–
Quote: “The model and the trajectory analysis show that the bullet traveled in a straight line from the gunman to the bleachers, clipping Mr. Trump on its path.”
–
M.N.: If it were so, the bullet had to go through Trump’s head, given the proximity of the wounded ear to the skull. For some reason, it did not happen.
Look at the latest photo, with the ear open.
Does it look like a wound (whatever “grazing” or tangential) from AR-15 rifle, which produces “massive and extensive” damage?
Let the forensic specialists examine and evaluate it.
M.N.: If it were so, the bullet had to go through Trump’s head, given the proximity of the wounded ear to the skull. For some reason, it did not happen.
Look at the latest photo, with the ear open.
Does it look like a wound (whatever “grazing” or tangential) from AR-15 rifle, which produces “massive and extensive” damage?
Let the forensic specialists examine and evaluate it.
Views
https://x.com/mikenov/status/1817553578879336810
–
My opinion: this NYT article on “visual analysis” is a phony-baloney and the deliberately published piece of disinformation, aimed to skew and mislead the investigation, and it did.
I recommend to the Counterintelligence Services (maybe as the combined group) to assess and… pic.twitter.com/zd9gLBynBu— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) July 28, 2024
My opinion: this NYT article on “visual analysis” is a phony-baloney and the deliberately published piece of disinformation, aimed to skew and mislead the investigation, and it did.
I recommend to the Counterintelligence Services (maybe as the combined group) to assess and…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) July 28, 2024
This article refers to the NYT article UNCRITICALLY, simply repeating its main unproven thesis.
This is the style of the Soviet propaganda!
–
Trump rally bullet trajectory analysis contradicts FBI ‘shrapnel’ testimony on Capitol Hill: report https://t.co/nQwf09jBZk
The New York… pic.twitter.com/RFMBm5h7er— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) July 28, 2024
Categories
@mikenov: wray
wray – YouTube https://t.co/GpYhSidrn3 https://t.co/zREG3tV03F
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) July 28, 2024
Trump rally bullet trajectory analysis contradicts FBI ‘shrapnel’ testimony on Capitol Hill: report https://t.co/nQwf09jBZk
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) July 28, 2024