The Ocean Avenue News - oceanavenuenews.comTHE ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF BROOKLYN AND THE NYC FIRE DEPARTMENT processed from the Brooklyn Bridge to the Co-Cathedral of St. Joseph.
The post Memorializing its firefighter neighbors, Brooklyn Eagle published early illuminated tribute appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
“No day,” as the poet Virgil wrote in words emblazoned on a 9/11 Memorial and Museum wall, shall erase the victims of the attacks “from the memory of time.”
But on the 23rd anniversary of the Sept. 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the families who have gathered in Lower Manhattan for the annual memorial ceremony year after year are grappling not only with the grief of the loved ones they lost, but also the fear that the day’s importance is fading from public memory.
On Wednesday morning at the National 9/11 Memorial and Museum, mourning families lifted photographs of their loved ones skyward as bells tolled at the significant moments of the attack’s progression, starting at 8:46 a.m., when the hijacked American Airlines Flight 11 struck the World Trade Center. The tolls went on to mark the moments when the South Tower and Pentagon were struck, the Twin Towers collapsed and hijacked United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in Pennsylvania.
All these years later, loved ones gathered for Wednesday’s memorial told amNewYork Metro that they fear future generations will forget the impact that catastrophic attacks had on the country and millions of people.
“It’s not just on 9/11. I live in pain every single day with the void of my brother in my heart,” said Anthoula Katsimatides, who lost her brother John Katsimatides that morning. “There seems to be a new wave of people that weren’t around 20 years ago, and it is frightening. This was the largest terrorist attack on US soil that ever occurred in this nation. It’s not something that happened somewhere else. It happened here and we are at the site where thousands of people lost their lives. If we don’t educate people, we are doomed to have history repeat itself.”
Katsimatides recalls her brother as a bright-eyed, spirited, and funny 31-year-old bonds broker who worked on the 104th floor for Cantor Fitzgerald; he was one of more than 600 Cantor Fitzgerald employees who died in the attack.
The sheer vibrance of his personality provided her with comfort and hope that he would return home on that terrible September 11th morning. She held out that hope for a month, but he never came home, one day he was just gone.
“I knew he would make his way home –- I had no doubt about it. I remember crying and falling to my knees when the Towers fell because I was crying for my city. I was crying for all of those people who were killed that day still holding out hope that he would return. I think I held out that hope for a month. We never received anything,” a tearful Katsimatides said, going on to advocate for the significance of the yearly commemoration.
“It is important to hear our loved ones’ names because it makes it real for the global population that is watching this event to remember that these were real people. This is where they lost their lives. This is where they released their souls,” she added.
Magaly Lemagne also stressed the magnitude of the term “never forget.” She mourns her brother, Port Authority Officer David Lemagne who perished during the 9/11 terror attacks after making the ultimate sacrifice to save others.
Twenty-seven-year-old David Lemagne was only on the job for nine months when he saw the first plane hit the North Tower from Exchange Place in Jersey City. Also, working as a paramedic with experience from the first World Trade Center bombing in 1993, he fought against commands to be deployed in Liberty State Park and instead ran head-first into the Twin Towers, where he lost his life.
“He goes, ‘I know what I am doing. I need to go there.’ So, he responded here in a car with somebody else, and we got pictures where…I think we got it two years later.. of him saving someone. But when the second Tower went down, he perished,” Lemagne said. “When we received that picture. He wasn’t scared. He was doing his job. He was carrying a woman, and they used a door as a makeshift stretcher.”
Lemagne made sure to bring her 13-year-old son with her to the memorial, sharing that he was named after his uncle.
“He did what he loved, and that was saving people,” Lemagne said. “He made a sacrifice that day so I will always be here on September 11th.”
Joining families of 9/11 victims at the ceremony Wednesday were President Joe Biden and the two candidates seeking to succeed him in the November election — Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump.
Former Mayors Mike Bloomberg, who now chairs the 9/11 Memorial and Museum board, and Rudy Giuliani, who was hizzoner during the 9/11 attacks, stood alongside Biden, Harris, Trump and other dignitaries at the ceremony’s start.
Mayor Eric Adams, who tested positive for COVID-19 earlier this week, laid a memorial wreath outside Gracie Mansion, the mayor’s official residence.
FERRY SERVICE EXPANSION TO CONEY ISLAND and the Rockaways is at the heart of a legislation package from Brannan and Brooks-Powers.
The post Annual 9/11 mass at Co-Cathedral pays tribute to firefighters appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
It was standing room only, and barely any of that, at a heated two and a half hour public hearing on the Arrow Linen rezoning application in South Slope held by Community Board 7 Monday night, where 29 residents had the chance to speak to the crowd and many others expressed their views through roaring boos, cheers, signs, and heckles.
More than 400 people turned out for the hearing on the contentious proposal to build two 13- to 19-story apartment towers at the Arrow Linen commercial laundry site at 467 Prospect Ave. Many made their views clear by holding one of two opposing signs: “Housing Not Highrises” for those against the application and “Build More Homes” for those supporting it.
At stake is whether a developer will be allowed to waive existing rules to put up two mostly market-rate luxury towers four to five times taller than existing row houses; or build a three-story apartment complex as of right; or, as a local group and an affordable housing developer have proposed, create a fully affordable development with a greater number of units that will be more than double the height of existing homes at six to nine stories. Any of those outcomes could potentially set a precedent for development in the general area.
Speakers were almost evenly split over the proposal: 15 spoke against the rezoning application and 13 spoke in support. One didn’t explicitly state whether he is for or against it, but said he supports housing at the site. Local Council Member Shahana Hanif and Assembly Member Robert Carroll also spoke at the meeting.
Hanif, who plays an important role in the proposal’s future, said she won’t take a stance until public feedback is over, but did make clear she wants deeper affordability than the minimum required by a rezoning. Meanwhile Carroll, who represents the district and said he was born and raised there, vehemently opposes the rezoning and supports the shorter, 100% affordable development.
“Community members have identified one affordable housing group, Catholic Charities, but I know that there are multiple affordable housing developers that would love to develop at the Arrow Linen site,” Carroll said. He said a seven- to nine-story development with 250 units of permanently affordable housing “much more seamlessly fits into the character of our neighborhood.”
He added that as proposed the rezoning risks creating a domino effect on nearby neighborhoods with large working class and immigrant communities. “My hope is that the city will partner with the community, rather than forcing through a rezoning that would set a precedent leading to real estate speculation of more luxury developments, and a potential chain of reaction,” he said.
He added the proposed developer, Apex Development Group, has no experience in residential development, let alone in industrial waste remediation such as what the Arrow Linen site would require after operating as a commercial laundromat for more than 100 years.
The meeting came weeks after Housing Not Highrises said they had connected with an affordable housing developer who is interested in purchasing the site and building a seven- to nine-story, 100% deeply affordable development on the site. The group has also last week filed a lawsuit against the city asking to delay the land use review process, known as ULURP, until after the mayor’s proposed City of Yes zoning changes have been decided, because they could allow for a substantially larger development.
Early on in the meeting, a rep from the community board read a statement from Catholic Charities Progress of Peoples Development Corporation that said the group had been approached by Housing Not Highrises asking if it could build “a financeable, 100% affordable development” on the Arrow Linen site, similar to its nearby seven-story Bishop Boardman senior affordable development at 1615 8th Ave. The nonprofit said it could do so with an R6A zoning designation (which would also require a rezoning) and said it was willing to discuss a sale with the owner of the site.
“On June 5, CCPOP reached out to representatives of the Arrow Linen site. At this meeting, CCPOP asked Arrow Linen representatives if there was an interest in selling the site. CCPOP was informed that the property owners were not interested in selling and therefore did not present an offer to purchase,” the statement said. “All information has been communicated, and CCPOP has no further involvement in this property. CCPOP appreciates the opportunity to clarify our involvement with this site, and would like to thank all parties for their support of our mission.”
While the lobbyist for Arrow Linen Michael Woloz, representatives for its legal team, and Andrew Esposito of Apex Development were at the meeting, the owners of Arrow Linen did not attend. The representative from the legal team presented the proposal, saying the rezoning would facilitate the development of two 13-story buildings with 244 apartments.
Included would be 34 studios, 56 one-bedrooms, 114 two-bedrooms, and 40 three-bedrooms. Because of the rezoning, the development would have to include 25-30% affordable housing at either an average of 60% or 80% of Area Median Income.
The rep said the development team would go for the 25 percent option at the 60 percent AMI average, and would include 24 apartments for households at 40% AMI, 24 for households at 60% AMI, and 13 for households at 80% AMI. At current rates, that would include studios for between $1,013 and $2,100, one-bedrooms for between $1,081 and $2,246, two-bedrooms for between $1,289 and $2,687, and three-bedrooms for between $1,481 and $3,096. AMI will almost certainly increase by the time the development is complete, meaning the price of the rentals will too.
Of those who spoke against the rezoning application, most said it is too big for the surrounding area (and risks being much bigger with City of Yes expansions), too expensive, and doesn’t adequately factor in infrastructure and environmental concerns. Most said they support the smaller, 100% affordable development.
Julia Melzer said the community has been “wholly shut out” of any engagement on the proposal, which she said would “forever mar our urban landscape” and is being pushed “to greedily line the pockets” of Arrow Linen.
“I deeply value the importance of inclusive planning that enables vibrant and livable communities and I, like almost everyone in this room, think this is a prime site for more housing, but it needs to reflect the community. This application, however, has been dishonest, behind closed doors,” she said.
She added the community could not meaningfully review the application without an articulated proposal of what would be built under the City of Yes, and said meanwhile “environmental issues are underestimated or ignored,” with the current proposal not slated to go through environmental review because it does not meet the city’s new threshold.
Melissa Olson, who said she rents on Prospect Avenue with family, said she has “searched and searched for a larger rental in this area. I’ve come to realize we don’t have a crisis of availability in Brooklyn, there are plenty of units we can see, what we have is a crisis of affordability.”
Olson said nearby rezonings, including on 4th Avenue, had increased housing prices in the area and are like playing a “game of monopoly.”
“I would love for 100 percent affordable units to go in one block away from me that maybe my family could live in,” she said, adding her family makes 60-80% AMI. “I don’t want to live in a high-rise, but I do want to live somewhere where I can afford.”
She added that the city’s job is not to ensure Arrow Linen makes maximum profit from its site, but to “ensure all communities provide affordable housing in a fair way, without ruining those same neighborhoods for existing residents in the process.”
Adriana DiNardo, who has lived in the area since 1978, said she also backs the 100% affordable development, saying the city needs more rent-stabilized apartments, not market-rate units. She said the real crisis is affordability, not supply. That is demonstrated by the fact the city has continued to have high rates of development over the last few years while at the same time population has decreased and homelessness has soared, she said.
Jay Golderberg said the rezoning would be a “huge blow to affordability” and to the people who live and work in the community today, especially the renters in the 59 units of rent-stabilized housing that the rezoning encompasses.
“Speculators and developers will buy every building in the neighborhood, and it’s clear that the city will let them build whatever they ask for,” he said.
He said the Catholic Charities option is exactly what the community needs, and provides more units than what Arrow Linen has proposed, and they would all be affordable. If the rezoning is approved as requested, the affordable option would be off the table because of the dramatic increase in land value, he said.
Luz Torres, who has lived in Brooklyn for 70 years and owns and lives in one of the houses on Prospect Avenue that would be included in the rezoned area, said the proposal is being pushed through under the guise of providing affordable housing, which she said isn’t accurate. “I resent it.” She said she rents the units in her house to long-term tenants at affordable rates.
“I want the record to know that I do not want my land rezoned by this private applicant for a rezoning I do not support in my community,” she stated.
In a break from discussing the proposal at hand, speaker Eric Olson used his testimony to interrogate Open New York, which has supported the proposed rezoning. He called the group a “libertarian think tank and propaganda outlet for real estate” whose origins started with a wealthy real estate investor and funding from Facebook.
He said its goals “seem to be attacking community members who have legitimate concerns about unregulated development in their neighborhoods, calling them racist NIMBYS and tricking everyday people into becoming lobbyists for the real estate industry.”
He urged DCP and Hanif to “instead consider the alternative that would bring 100% affordable human-scale housing to the city, something that the people who live here actually want.”
But not all local residents were in agreement.
David Ehrenberg, who said he grew up near the Arrow Linen site and still lives in the area, said all the local residents, especially children, “benefit from the extraordinarily public and publicly funded assets that this neighborhood hosts.”
“There is simply, in my view, no credible argument that this neighborhood cannot accept more residents,” he said. “Concerns about this project gentrifying the neighborhood ignore the fact that this neighborhood, at least for the 48 years that I’ve lived here, has been going through unrelenting gentrification with effectively zero new construction in this part of the neighborhood.”
He added that while the 100% affordable development sounds like a good proposal, the city had limited affordable housing subsidies to get it built.
Michelle de la Uz, of the Fifth Avenue Committee, seconded that, saying there is a backlog in public funding for four to five years, and she supports the rezoning as is because Mandatory Inclusionary Housing will provide affordable apartments without needing public money.
Rachel Fee agreed that while the 100% affordable option “would be great,” it isn’t what is being proposed and “there is no such deal being entertained by this site owner.”
“Affordable housing projects that are 100% affordable use the city’s limited capital subsidies, which are normally invested in low income communities where market rents aren’t high enough to cross subsidize affordable rents. That’s not this neighborhood where average rents are over $4,500 a month,” she said.
She said if communities kept opposing housing development the affordability crisis would continue to get worse. “I’m sick of my family and friends being priced out of this neighborhood.”
Jessica Yager said she also had a background in affordable housing development in NYC, and said “the truth is that there is no world in which there will be 100 percent affordable building on this site.”
“The amount of subsidies that it would require simply isn’t feasible or realistic, so don’t let that fantasy undermine the very good reality-based option that’s on the table. Our community needs affordable housing, and with this proposal, we get it. Our community also desperately needs housing at all price points,” she said.
Editor of transport-focused publication Streetsblog Gersh Kuntzman also testified in support of the proposed rezoning, saying in meetings he had covered “you always hear of a white knight developer who could do a project of 100% affordability at a lower density” but he said if there is a plan in place, the community would be debating it.
“This neighborhood has an affordability crisis. I’m living proof of it, because in a couple of months, you’ll see me living somewhere in Bushwick or in Sunset Park or somewhere else. I’m not looking for your sympathy, I’m just here to say in my remaining minute that I urge the board to vote yes on this project,” he said.
Courtney Adrian, who said she is a renter raising her family in the area, took a more direct tone, saying there is an age and wealth gap in the room between those for and against the proposal and said, “I think you people made it up out of thin air,” regarding the 100 percent affordable proposal.
Drew Edwards similarly said he is raising his family in the neighborhood and said it isn’t affordable to do so. “That’s a fact. We have amazing schools…but schools across District 15 are under enrolled.”
He said when he thinks about neighborhood character, he thinks about “people bringing their children to school, walking down the street and seeing my friends and their kids, and playing together in the park.”
“I want new neighbors to come. I want my daughter to have new friends that come to this neighborhood, and in order for that to happen, you have to build the homes for people to live in,” he said. “You shouldn’t have to wait for something to die in order to move to the neighborhood.”
Community Board 7 will meet again on Thursday night to hear another round of testimony in a public hearing that will be held on Zoom. After the public hearings, the board will eventually vote on the proposal, which will then head to the Borough President’s desk, the City Planning Commission, and then to the City Council for a decision.
This story first appeared on Brooklyn Paper’s sister site Brownstoner.
With the president away, I arrived later than usual that morning and headed to a breakfast in the small senior staff dining room.
The post ‘Get out now’ – inside the White House on 9/11, according to the staffers who were there appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
A Brooklyn firehouse honored several of its own on the 23rd anniversary of 9/11, one of many commemorations taking place across Brooklyn and New York City on Wednesday.
Members of Engine Company 214 and Tower Ladder 111 in Bedford-Stuyvesant remembered five firefighters who were killed during the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001, when hijacked planes struck the World Trade Center, killing nearly 3,000 people and devastating the city.
“This is a firehouse that is steeped in tradition,” Tower Ladder 111’s Steven McKinney told Brooklyn Paper. “Every time I get on the rig, I take a look at their pictures hanging on the wall to remember their commitment to excellence.”
The FDNY lost 343 firefighters in the line of duty on 9/11 and has since lost 373 more to related illnesses. The firehouse of Engine Company 214 and Tower Ladder 111 has 12 members with connections to those killed or who have passed away from illnesses.
“At this firehouse, you’d hear weights dropping on the floor during a workout or banter in the kitchen. We’d even take bets on whether the job would be on the top floor or in the basement of a brownstone,” Rescue Battalion Chief Malcolm Moore said. “All the guys we lost made us better firefighters through their work ethic, whether during training or at a fire.”
Across New York City, firehouses and communities gathered to reflect on the lasting impact of 9/11 and honor the bravery and sacrifice of those lost.
Assembly Member William Colton and Council Member Susan Zhuang will host a memorial service at Seth Low Park at 11 a.m., and FDNY Battalion 57 will gather for a memorial mass at the Co-Cathedral of St. Joseph at noon. Later, locals will pay their respects at candlelight vigils and tributes in places like Bill Brown Park and Asser Levy Park, with events continuing into the evening, including a 7 p.m. ceremony at the American Veterans Memorial Pier in Bay Ridge and an interfaith service on the Brooklyn Heights Promenade at 7:15 p.m. Green-Wood Cemetery will also hold a tribute from 7 to 9 p.m. overlooking the 9/11 Memorial Lights.
AIRLINE LOYALTY REWARD PROGRAMS of the United States’ largest carriers are under investigation from the U.S. Department of Transportation.
The post City Council pushes bills to revive ferry development in Coney Island, the Rockaways appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
CALLING AMERICA’S COMMITMENT TO FIRST-RESPONDERS “IRONCLAD,” House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-8) issued a statement.
The post Federal government investigates airline loyalty programs appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.