Day: November 13, 2024

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review two challenges to New York’s rent stabilization law, leaving intact regulations. 

The post U.S. Supreme Court keeps its hands off Brooklyn’s rent-stabilized apartments appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.

As open enrollment for health insurance plans under ACA begins, New York Attorney General James is warning residents to stay vigilant. 

The post Attorney General warns New Yorkers of health insurance scams during open enrollment appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.

The City Council on Wednesday overwhelmingly voted to free New York renters from having to pay costly real estate broker fees — passing legislation introduced by a Brooklyn Council Member that will make the party who hires a listing agent responsible for footing the bill.

The legislation passed by a veto-proof majority of 42 to 8 — with the “no” votes coming from Republicans and conservative Democrats. While Mayor Eric Adams has not said whether he intends to sign the bill, he vented concerns about it during a Tuesday news conference.

Proponents of the FARE (Fairness in Apartment Rentals) Act say it will remove a significant financial hurdle to New Yorkers being able to afford apartments because at present, renters are often on the hook for paying broker fees. The legislation would effectively mandate that if a landlord is hiring a broker, as they do in many cases, they will have to pay the fee.

Supporters say broker fees — which can cost an average of 15% of a tenant’s monthly rent — represent a substantial upfront cost that can be a barrier to apartment renters.

At a City Hall press conference prior to the vote, Council Member Chi Ossé, the bill’s prime sponsor, said the legislation would relieve tenants of having to foot the bill for brokers they often did not hire.

“In too many millions of cases across our city and decades of history, tenants have been forced to hand over thousands of dollars in fees to brokers they never hired nor wanted. The harm of this practice cannot be overstated,” said Ossé, who represents parts of Bed-Stuy and Crown Heights. “Today is a win for the people of New York as we make official what has long been common sense: you should get what you pay for and pay for what you get.”

The city Department of Consumer and Worker Protection would enforce the legislation, according to the council. Those who violate its terms would be subject to fines that could reach $2,000.

The council passed the measure as the city is experiencing an acute affordable housing crisis. This crisis has caused rents to soar, with only 1.4% of rental units were available last year.

Upper Manhattan Council Member Shaun Abreu (D), another key sponsor of the bill, called the legislation “seismic.”

“For many of us, it’s gonna make all the difference for our families,” Abreu said. “It’s gonna be the difference between being able to have an apartment or not being able to have an apartment.”

The council member said that in his district, many renters have to cough up $12,000 to $15,000 just to rent an apartment. That sum includes first month’s rent, a security deposit and a broker fee.

On the other hand, real estate industry leaders charge the bill would raise rather than lower costs for renters. They argue that in order to offset the cost of paying for brokers themselves, landlords will bake the cost into the montly rent. Therefore, they argued, tenants would end up paying more every month for the duration of their lease instead of a one-time fee.

Real estate industry leaders also contend that renters currently have the freedom to choose between apartment listings that come with broker fees and those that do not; the legislation would, they say, remove that choice.

Far-right Council Member Vickie Paladino (R-Queens) railed against the bill before voting against it. In addition to increasing rents, she argued it would hurt small businesspeople — meaning real estate agents — and force thousands of units to go unadvertised.

“I sincerely hope that the real estate industry sues to have this law stopped,” she said.

Adams echoed some of the same arguments on Tuesday. While he said he agrees with the bill’s intent, he believes it could have unintended consequences that will hurt real estate brokers and renters.

“Some of the ideals collide with the reality of the operationalizing implementation,” Adams said on Tuesday. “We got to get it right, make sure that we reach the goals that we’re looking for, and at the same time don’t hurt small property owners and try to get some relief to some of those who are trying to live in the city … I think the bill has the right intention, but sometimes good intentions do not get the results you’re looking for.”

However, City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams said she was surprised to hear the mayor airing concerns about the bill considering his office was involved in crafting it.

“We worked together with the administration on this bill, and I can’t interpret what the mayor is saying, but the administration was a part of the negotiations on this bill,” the speaker said. “They raised no major issues, and I haven’t heard from the mayor personally on it.”

This story first appeared on Brooklyn Paper’s sister site amNewYork. 

The Kings County Supreme Court hosted the third Annual Unity in Diversity Fair, its largest celebration of Global Diversity Awareness Month.

The post Kings County Courts celebrate diversity at third Annual Unity in Diversity Fair appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.

NY ATTORNEY GENERAL LETITIA JAMES on Wednesday  announced the arrests and indictments of eight suspects.

The post Eight arrested for selling fentanyl, cocaine and firearms in Brooklyn appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.