Images may be subject to copyright. Learn More
My opinion: this NYT article on “visual analysis” is a phony-baloney and the deliberately published piece of disinformation, aimed to skew and mislead the investigation, and it did.
I recommend to the Counterintelligence Services (maybe as the combined group) to assess and investigate this article and the related issues very carefully. The help from specialists is needed.
–
Speculation Swirls About What Hit Trump. An Analysis Suggests It was a Bullet – The New York Times nytimes.com/2024/07/26/us/
–
Quote: “The model and the trajectory analysis show that the bullet traveled in a straight line from the gunman to the bleachers, clipping Mr. Trump on its path.”
I recommend to the Counterintelligence Services (maybe as the combined group) to assess and investigate this article and the related issues very carefully. The help from specialists is needed.
–
Speculation Swirls About What Hit Trump. An Analysis Suggests It was a Bullet – The New York Times nytimes.com/2024/07/26/us/
–
Quote: “The model and the trajectory analysis show that the bullet traveled in a straight line from the gunman to the bleachers, clipping Mr. Trump on its path.”
–
M.N.: If it were so, the bullet had to go through Trump’s head, given the proximity of the wounded ear to the skull. For some reason, it did not happen.
Look at the latest photo, with the ear open.
Does it look like a wound (whatever “grazing” or tangential) from AR-15 rifle, which produces “massive and extensive” damage?
Let the forensic specialists examine and evaluate it.
M.N.: If it were so, the bullet had to go through Trump’s head, given the proximity of the wounded ear to the skull. For some reason, it did not happen.
Look at the latest photo, with the ear open.
Does it look like a wound (whatever “grazing” or tangential) from AR-15 rifle, which produces “massive and extensive” damage?
Let the forensic specialists examine and evaluate it.
Views
https://x.com/mikenov/status/1817553578879336810
–