Categories
Michael Novakhov's favorite articles

News outlets deny watchdog’s allegations that they were tipped to Hamas attacks


GettyImages-1769500690.jpg?_t=1699565553

A member of Israel’s war cabinet and a leader of its political opposition raised questions Thursday about how photojournalists in Gaza were able to capture images of Hamas terrorists breaching the border fence during the Oct. 7 attack on Israel.

The comments by Benny Gantz, a former Israeli defense minister who joined Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s government after the attack, and Yair Lapid, a former TV journalist who served as prime minister for the second half of 2022, followed accusations that photojournalists and the wire services using their images may have had advance knowledge of the Hamas attack. Those claims were made in a lengthy post on Wednesday by a pro-Israel media watchdog called Honest Reporting. 

“Journalists found to have known about the massacre, and still chose to stand as idle bystanders while children were slaughtered  are no different than terrorists and should be treated as such,” Gantz, a former head of the Israel Defense Forces, said on X.

Lapid, leader of Israel’s centrist Yesh Atid party, called on the news organizations to provide more detail about how the photographers managed to capture images of burning Israeli tanks and people being abducted. “The same way the international media is always asking for a response from us — we are now demanding a response from them,” he tweeted. “Who are those journalists? Were they involved in the attack? Did they know in advance? And are you going to fire them?”

The news organizations categorically denied any foreknowledge of the attack, but two cut ties with a freelancer shown by Honest Reporting in a selfie with a Hamas commander.

Media deny advance knowledge

On its website and on social media, Honest Reporting showcased photos by seven freelancers that were taken early on Oct. 7 and published by Reuters and The Associated Press. The freelancers have also worked for The New York Times and CNN. 

The AP said in a statement that the first pictures it received were taken more than an hour after the assaults began. Reuters said its first images were made “two hours after Hamas fired rockets across southern Israel and more than 45 minutes after Israel said gunmen had crossed the border.” 

No AP staff were at the border at the time of the attacks, nor did any AP staffer cross the border at any time,” the AP said.

A spokeswoman for The Times called the accusations “reckless,” “untrue and outrageous.”

The organization behind the accusations

Honest Reporting, which describes itself as a nonprofit “exposing anti-Israel media bias,” is headed by Jacki Alexander, a former regional director for the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, a lobbying group.

Its report, titled Broken Borders: AP & Reuters Pictures of Hamas Atrocities Raise Ethical Questions, suggests that Gaza-based photographers were tipped off by Hamas and accompanied terrorists from Gaza into Israel to document the massacres as they unfolded. 

Honest Reporting says the “early morning presence at the breached border” of news photographers “raises serious ethical questions. What were they doing there so early on what would ordinarily have been a quiet Saturday morning? Was it coordinated with Hamas?” 

Danny Danon, a right-wing Knesset member and Israel’s former United Nations ambassador, piled on Thursday, vowing to hunt the photographers “down together with the terrorists.” 

Israel’s official account on X repeated Honest Reporting’s allegations. Jewish Insider reported that Israeli government officials asked the news organizations for explanations. 

Along with photographs taken on the morning of the attack, Honest Reporting circulated an image, apparently taken well before Oct. 7, showing one of the photographers, Hassan Eslaiah, posing with Yahya Sinwar, a legendary Hamas leader. That led both CNN and AP to say that they have cut ties with Eslaiah, though CNN said it had no reason “to doubt the journalistic accuracy of the work he has done for us.” 

In defense of war photography

The Times responded with a “defense of freelance photojournalists working in conflict areas, whose jobs often require them to rush into danger to provide first-hand witness accounts and to document important news.

“This is the essential role of a free press in wartime,” its statement said. “We are gravely concerned that unsupported accusations and threats to freelancers endangers them and undermines work that serves the public interest.”

The AP echoed this, saying its role is “to gather information on breaking news events around the world, wherever they happen, even when those events are horrific and cause mass casualties.” 

Hamas militants murdered 1,400 people in kibbutzim near the Gaza border and at a music festival, and took 240 hostages, including 30 children. The attack started a war in which the Hamas-run health ministry says more than 10,000 people in Gaza have been killed by Israeli airstrikes and ground troops.

The controversy over the role of war photographers brings to mind the arrest of Bilal Hussein, an AP photographer known for his images of the 2004 battle of Fallujah in the Iraq War. The city, an al-Qaeda stronghold, was dangerous for journalists, but Hussein was a native and used his contacts to cover the U.S. attack on the city. His image of insurgents shooting at U.S. soldiers helped AP win a Pulitzer. 

Hussein was sent by AP from Fallujah to cover the conflict in the city of Ramadi. He was arrested there in 2006 by U.S. Marines and held for two years without charge. His case became a cause celebre for  the Committee to Protect Journalists and others. The U.S. military released him in 2008 saying he “no longer presented an imperative threat to security.” 

The post News outlets deny watchdog’s allegations that they were tipped to Hamas attacks appeared first on The Forward.