NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL LETITIA JAMES HELPED DISTRIBUTE HOT MEALS TO RESIDENTS OF EAST FLATBUSH on Monday.
The post Elected officials help distribute meals at church soup kitchen appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
Day: November 4, 2025
FORMER U.S. VICE PRESIDENT DICK CHENEY DIED MONDAY, NOV. 3, AT AGE 84. Cheney visited Brooklyn in 2008 to endorse a congressmember.
The post Former Vice President Dick Cheney dies, once endorsed Brooklyn’s Vito Fossella appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
POLICE ARE SEEKING three men suspected of stabbing a man and robbing him in East New York, leaving him in critical condition.
The post Police seek three in East New York stabbing, robbery; victim critical appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
#ZangezurCorridor #SouthCaucasus x.com/mikenov/status/1985768212407967873
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 4, 2025
SCANDINAVIAN AUTUMN TRADITIONS WILL BE SHOWCASED AT THE HØSTFEST taking place at Bethlehem Lutheran Church.
The post Discover Scandinavian autumn traditions at Høstfest appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
#SouthCaucasus
#zangezurcorridor – Google Search google.com/search?q=zangezur…
The Zangezur Corridor is a proposed transport route connecting mainland Azerbaijan to its Nakhchivan exclave through Armenia’s #Syunik Province. Strongly supported by Azerbaijan and Turkey, the project involves building roads, railways, and other infrastructure, but it is highly contentious due to Armenian and Iranian opposition. The project is entangled in a complex geopolitical struggle involving major powers like Russia, the US, China, Iran, and Turkey, who all have strategic interests in the region.
Key aspects of the Zangezur Corridor projectFunction: To create a direct land bridge between Azerbaijan and Turkey, bypassing Armenia. It would also include oil and gas pipelines and fiber optic lines.
Geopolitical significance:Strategic location: The proposed 43-kilometer corridor would link the South Caucasus with Türkiye.
Economic impact: Could significantly boost regional trade by creating a vital link in the East–West and North–South transport networks.
Regional power dynamics: The project is a source of tension between Azerbaijan, Armenia, Iran, and Russia, each with competing interests.International involvement: The project has attracted major international players, including the US, which is financing and overseeing a portion of the corridor.
Current status: While the 2020 ceasefire agreement stipulated the unblocking of economic connections, including the Zangezur corridor, its implementation has been stalled due to disagreements over control and security, with Armenia insisting on customs and border controls and Azerbaijan rejecting them.Arguments and perspectives
Azerbaijan and Turkey: View the corridor as crucial for regional connectivity and economic development, and as a way to normalize relations with Armenia.
Armenia: Opposes the project due to concerns about its sovereignty and security, fearing a loss of strategic control over its territory.
Iran: Views the corridor as a threat, fearing it will sever its border with Armenia and empower pan-Turkic influence in the region.
Russia: Sees the corridor as a way to expand its influence in the region and weaken its geopolitical rivals.AI responses may include mistakes.
— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 4, 2025
#SouthCaucasus
The #GeneticStudies of the #Armenia-n ethnic group – Google Search google.com/search?q=The+gene…
Genetic studies show that #Armenians are a distinct, largely isolated population native to the Armenian Highlands, with significant continuity from ancient ancestors over thousands of years. Their genetic makeup shows an affinity to both Near Eastern and European groups, reflecting a Bronze Age mixing of Eurasian populations, but with modern isolation since the Bronze Age. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Genetic continuity and isolationLong-term continuity: Genetic analyses of ancient and modern Armenians reveal a remarkable continuity, with modern Armenians showing little genetic distance from skeletons from as far back as 7,800 years ago.
Genetic isolation: Studies suggest that Armenians have been largely genetically isolated since the end of the Bronze Age, with no significant admixture from other populations in recent history. This has resulted in a unique genetic signature within the region. [1, 3, 4, 5]Origins and ancestry
Bronze Age mixing: The diversity of the Armenian genome can be explained by mixtures of various Eurasian populations that occurred around 3000–2000 BCE.
Near Eastern and European connections: Armenians have a strong genetic link to the Near East, but also show a higher genetic affinity to Neolithic Europeans than other present-day Near Easterners, with some studies suggesting roughly 29% of their ancestry may originate from a population represented by Neolithic Europeans.
Rejection of Balkan ancestry theory: Historical theories suggesting a strong Balkan origin for Armenians are not supported by modern genetic data, according to the Cell Press study published in The American Journal of Human Genetics. Instead, recent evidence points to genetic input from a source linked to Neolithic Levantine Farmers after the Early Bronze Age. [1, 2, 6, 7, 8]Key haplogroups
Patrilineal (Y-chromosome): The most common haplogroups are R1b (including the Yamnaya-associated R-Z2103 lineage), J2a, and J1a. The greatest genetic diversity for these haplogroups is observed in the Armenian highlands.
Matrilineal (mtDNA): The primary haplogroups are H (), J (), U (), and N (). The modern composition is consistent with ancient samples from the region, with the exception of the N lineage, which is not found in ancient samples. [9]AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origin…
[2] pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2648…
[3] youtube.com/watch?v=Zrq_kVKE…
[4] cell.com/cms/10.1016/j.ajhg.…
[5] facebook.com/groups/15583737…
[6] nature.com/articles/ejhg2015…
[7] cell.com/ajhg/fulltext/S0002…
[8] researchgate.net/publication…
[9] ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/article…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 4, 2025
Putin and the issue of the transfer of power in Russia – Google Search google.com/search?q=Putin+an…
Vladimir Putin has effectively addressed the issue of the transfer of power by altering the political system to allow him to remain in power until at least 2036, while also delegating day-to-day management and cultivating a new generation of loyal officials. The transition is designed not for a genuine handover to a single successor, but to maintain authority firmly in Putin’s hands through a reorganized system. [1, 2, 3]
Key Aspects of the Power Structure • Constitutional Changes: A 2020 national referendum approved constitutional amendments that, among other things, effectively reset Putin’s presidential term limits, allowing him to run for two more six-year terms after his current term expired in 2024.
• Delegation, Not Relinquishment: Current personnel moves (in 2024-2025) indicate a “regime transition” where Putin delegates routine management to younger officials from his inner circle while retaining strategic and ultimate control.
• Strengthening Other Bodies: Putin has enhanced the role of the State Council and the Security Council, which some analysts believe could be potential “retirement homes” allowing him to retain significant influence even if he were to eventually leave the presidency.
• Absence of a Clear Successor: While several individuals are discussed as potential successors (such as Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, Tula Governor Alexei Dyumin, and Defense Minister Andrei Belousov), no single person has been clearly designated. Putin has stated that the choice is ultimately for the people and that there should be several candidates.
• Cultivating Loyalty: Promotions are favoring younger officials, including former bodyguards and those from the security services, whose fortunes and loyalty are personally tied to Putin. He has also indicated that future political leaders must be veterans of the Ukraine war, further entrenching a hard-line, nationalist approach. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]In essence, the issue of the “transfer of power” in Russia under Putin has been reframed. Instead of planning to transfer power to a successor, Putin has transformed the system to ensure his continued rule and the preservation of his political model for the long term. [1, 9, 10]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] nestcentre.org/transition-wi…
[2] nestcentre.org/transition-wi…
[3] npr.org/2020/07/01/886440694…
[4] meduza.io/en/feature/2020/01…
[5] aljazeera.com/news/2020/3/10…
[6] newsweek.com/russia-ukraine-…
[7] reuters.com/world/europe/put…
[8] rferl.org/a/russia-putin-suc…
[9] politico.eu/article/who-will…
[10] institutmontaigne.org/en/exp…
–
lansinginstitute.org/2025/10…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 4, 2025
Putin and the issue of the transfer of power in Russia – Google Search google.com/search?q=Putin+an…
Vladimir Putin has effectively addressed the issue of the transfer of power by altering the political system to allow him to remain in power until at least 2036, while also delegating day-to-day management and cultivating a new generation of loyal officials. The transition is designed not for a genuine handover to a single successor, but to maintain authority firmly in Putin’s hands through a reorganized system. [1, 2, 3]
Key Aspects of the Power Structure • Constitutional Changes: A 2020 national referendum approved constitutional amendments that, among other things, effectively reset Putin’s presidential term limits, allowing him to run for two more six-year terms after his current term expired in 2024.
• Delegation, Not Relinquishment: Current personnel moves (in 2024-2025) indicate a “regime transition” where Putin delegates routine management to younger officials from his inner circle while retaining strategic and ultimate control.
• Strengthening Other Bodies: Putin has enhanced the role of the State Council and the Security Council, which some analysts believe could be potential “retirement homes” allowing him to retain significant influence even if he were to eventually leave the presidency.
• Absence of a Clear Successor: While several individuals are discussed as potential successors (such as Prime Minister Mikhail Mishustin, Tula Governor Alexei Dyumin, and Defense Minister Andrei Belousov), no single person has been clearly designated. Putin has stated that the choice is ultimately for the people and that there should be several candidates.
• Cultivating Loyalty: Promotions are favoring younger officials, including former bodyguards and those from the security services, whose fortunes and loyalty are personally tied to Putin. He has also indicated that future political leaders must be veterans of the Ukraine war, further entrenching a hard-line, nationalist approach. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]In essence, the issue of the “transfer of power” in Russia under Putin has been reframed. Instead of planning to transfer power to a successor, Putin has transformed the system to ensure his continued rule and the preservation of his political model for the long term. [1, 9, 10]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] nestcentre.org/transition-wi…
[2] nestcentre.org/transition-wi…
[3] npr.org/2020/07/01/886440694…
[4] meduza.io/en/feature/2020/01…
[5] aljazeera.com/news/2020/3/10…
[6] newsweek.com/russia-ukraine-…
[7] reuters.com/world/europe/put…
[8] rferl.org/a/russia-putin-suc…
[9] politico.eu/article/who-will…
[10] institutmontaigne.org/en/exp…
–
lansinginstitute.org/2025/10…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 4, 2025