NABU’s anti-corruption search uncovered a historic necklace and earrings, stolen from the French Louvre, inside assets linked to businessman Timur Mindich – Google Search google.com/search?q=NABU%E2%…
The claim that the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) found a historic necklace and earrings, stolen from the French Louvre, in assets linked to businessman Timur Mindich is false. [1, 2]
This claim originated from a video widely shared by pro-Russia social media users in November 2025, which falsely linked a real corruption scandal involving Mindich to a separate, actual jewelry heist at the Louvre Museum in October 2025. [1, 3]
Here is a summary of the facts:The Mindich Investigation NABU is genuinely investigating Timur Mindich, a former business partner and friend of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in connection with a real $100 million embezzlement scheme involving state energy companies. Mindich reportedly fled Ukraine hours before the searches of his properties took place.
The Louvre Heist A separate, professional heist occurred at the Louvre on October 19, 2025, where thieves stole eight priceless pieces of 19th-century jewelry, including an emerald necklace and earrings that once belonged to Empress Marie-Louise, the second wife of Napoleon. The stolen jewels have not been recovered, although several suspects have been arrested in France.
The Debunked Claim NABU has officially confirmed that its investigators did not find any of the stolen Louvre jewels during the investigation into Mindich’s assets. The image of the necklace in the circulating social media video was identified as being generated by artificial intelligence due to key discrepancies when compared to the real historic artifact. [1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7]The video and associated claims are considered disinformation intended to exploit the real corruption scandal and the high-profile museum theft for political purposes. [1]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] uk.news.yahoo.com/no-jewels-…
[2] uk.news.yahoo.com/no-jewels-…
[3] uk.news.yahoo.com/no-jewels-…
[4] abcnews.go.com/International…
[5] cnn.com/2025/11/19/europe/lo…
[6] san.com/cc/french-authoritie…
[7] apnews.com/article/russia-uk…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 26, 2025
NABU’s anti-corruption search uncovered a historic necklace and earrings, stolen from the French Louvre, inside assets linked to businessman Timur Mindich – Google Search google.com/search?q=NABU%E2%…
The claim that the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) found a historic necklace and earrings, stolen from the French Louvre, in assets linked to businessman Timur Mindich is false. [1, 2]
This claim originated from a video widely shared by pro-Russia social media users in November 2025, which falsely linked a real corruption scandal involving Mindich to a separate, actual jewelry heist at the Louvre Museum in October 2025. [1, 3]
Here is a summary of the facts:The Mindich Investigation NABU is genuinely investigating Timur Mindich, a former business partner and friend of Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, in connection with a real $100 million embezzlement scheme involving state energy companies. Mindich reportedly fled Ukraine hours before the searches of his properties took place.
The Louvre Heist A separate, professional heist occurred at the Louvre on October 19, 2025, where thieves stole eight priceless pieces of 19th-century jewelry, including an emerald necklace and earrings that once belonged to Empress Marie-Louise, the second wife of Napoleon. The stolen jewels have not been recovered, although several suspects have been arrested in France.
The Debunked Claim NABU has officially confirmed that its investigators did not find any of the stolen Louvre jewels during the investigation into Mindich’s assets. The image of the necklace in the circulating social media video was identified as being generated by artificial intelligence due to key discrepancies when compared to the real historic artifact. [1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7]The video and associated claims are considered disinformation intended to exploit the real corruption scandal and the high-profile museum theft for political purposes. [1]
AI responses may include mistakes.
[1] uk.news.yahoo.com/no-jewels-…
[2] uk.news.yahoo.com/no-jewels-…
[3] uk.news.yahoo.com/no-jewels-…
[4] abcnews.go.com/International…
[5] cnn.com/2025/11/19/europe/lo…
[6] san.com/cc/french-authoritie…
[7] apnews.com/article/russia-uk…— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 26, 2025
Since 1903, the club has been hosting a public New Year’s Day Plunge for all brave souls to welcome in the New Year.
The post Registration begins for annual Coney Island Polar Bear Club Plunge appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
U.S. Rep. Nydia Velázquez is urging the federal government to reinstate funding for New York City’s magnet schools, claiming the administration’s decision to cancel already-awarded grants was “illegal” and could impact students for years to come.
The Trump administration in September canceled $47 million in federal Magnet School Assistance Program funds after the city missed a deadline set by the federal Department of Education to change its policies on transgender students.
Federal officials had said the city’s rules allowing transgender students to use facilities and participate on sports teams in line with their gender identity violated Title IX, and said funding would be pulled unless those policies were changed.

The policies, which align with city and state law, remained in place — though Mayor Eric Adams publicly considered changing them — and the federal government summarily canceled five different five-year MSAP grants. It similarly cut MSAP grants for school districts in Chicago and Virginia.
“The administration is punishing New York children because the city refuses to turn its back on transgender students,” Velázquez told Brooklyn Paper in a statement. “That is unacceptable. Congress approved this funding, and the administration must do the right thing and release it immediately.”
The grants provided “critical funding” for STEAM, arts, engineering, journalism and leadership programs at schools “which have historically served isolated, and overwhelmingly low income, Hispanic and Black students,” according to a lawsuit the city filed against the federal DOE in October.
Five of those schools are located in Velázquez’s district: P.S. 171 Abraham Lincoln, P.S. 86 The Irvington, P.S. 116 Elizabeth L Farrell and P.S. 145 Andrew Jackson, all in Brooklyn; and P.S. 64 Joseph P. Addabbo in Ozone Park, Queens.

All five schools serve students who are majority Hispanic or Asian, and have higher-than-average numbers of students facing economic hardship, according to city data. The four Brooklyn schools were chosen to become magnet schools in 2022.
In a Nov. 17 letter to federal Department of Education secretary Linda E. McMahon and Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, Velázquez said the grant cancellation undermined the DOE’s own goals and could widen opportunity gaps for magnet school students.
“Your administration’s baseless cancellation of millions of grant funding in response to New York City policies that are inclusive and protective of students regardless of gender identity is not only reckless but discriminatory,” Velázquez wrote. “It demonstrates significant disregard for educating our country’s future leaders, and once again, your willingness to put your politics over the well-being of nearly 7,700 students attending the affected schools, five of which are … within my district.”

The MSAP program was created to support the desegregation of public schools, provide equitable access to high quality education, and create “innovative educational methods and practices,” per the U.S. Department of Education.
“In my district, magnet schools keep students engaged and help boost academic achievements, producing national chess champions, award-winning debaters, and accomplished dancers,” the congress member wrote. “The MSAP program has a proven track record of preparing students for success as they progress on the pathway to higher education.”
She urged the feds to reverse the cancellation “so that our city can continue to protect the civil rights of all students while providing quality education toall students to prepare them to enter the workforce and contribute meaningfully to our economy, culture, and civic life.”
Last month, New York City sued the federal DOE in an effort to get the grants reinstated.

Per court documents, federal officials in the past have found that the city’s MSAP projects were “entirely consistent with Title IX,” and that the Trump administration has a “fixation with upending the Department’s previously accepted interpretation of Title IX.”
The city also said the grant cancellations were carried out “unlawfully,” without observing Title IX’s rules, and were a “clear attempted end run around the Congressional directive that school funding not be pulled on a whim.”
On Nov. 20, the city and the U.S. DOE reached an agreement in federal court that allows NYCPS to use leftover grant funds — about $12 million — from Fiscal Year 2025 for expenses incurred in FY2026. The city will “continue to push to reach a final decision” on the grants for FY2026-28, said schools chancellor Melissa Aviles-Ramos in a statement.
The SWIFT Act changes Social Security benefit rules by addressing older benefit caps, legal restrictions and claiming requirements.
The post New bill would eliminate Social Security benefit caps for surviving spouses with disabilities appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
The SBA and organizations across the country celebrate small businesses on Nov. 29, also known as Small Business Saturday.
The post Origins of national Small Business Day and the growth of Small Business Saturday appeared first on Brooklyn Eagle.
NYSBA says posthumous admission “corrects a longstanding injustice” for Ely Parker brooklyneagle.com/352416/a-l…
— Brooklyn Eagle (@BklynEagle) Nov 26, 2025
share.google/aimode/Hmb13Wos…
Both #Putin and #Zelensky reject 19-point #peace #plan
Both Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky have effectively rejected a proposed 19-point peace plan backed by the U.S., though Ukraine indicated a willingness to use it as a basis for further discussion. Russia, however, appears ready to reject the plan entirely, demanding the original, more favorable terms it was first offered.
Ukraine’s Position
Ukraine has indicated a willingness to engage with the 19-point plan, which was amended in talks in Geneva and Abu Dhabi to remove several points heavily favoring Russia from an initial 28-point draft. Key changes in the 19-point version include:
No forced territorial concessions of regions still under Ukrainian control.
No strict limit on the size of Ukraine’s armed forces (the initial plan proposed a cap of 600,000 personnel).
Leaving the door open for NATO membership.
Ukraine peace plan expected to be rejected by Russia …
Nov 25, 2025 — Ukraine peace plan expected to be rejected by Russia — likely extending war until after Christmas at minimum: sources …New York Post·Caitlin Doornbos
Ukraine agrees to peace proposal, with only “minor details” to …
Nov 26, 2025 — Last week, CBS News obtained a draft of one Trump administration-backed proposal to end the war. The proposed plan inc…CBS News
While Zelensky has not “vetoed” the plan outright, he has expressed grave doubts about certain aspects and insisted that the most sensitive issues, particularly territorial integrity, must be resolved directly with U.S. President Donald Trump. Ukraine’s main “red lines” include never recognizing Russian-occupied territory as legally Russian and maintaining its right to self-defense.
Russia’s Position
Russia is expected to reject the 19-point plan, with Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov stating that Moscow will not agree to a plan that deviates from the “spirit and letter” of the original 28-point proposal, which heavily favored the Kremlin. Russia demands:
Recognition of occupied territories (Crimea, Donetsk, Luhansk, Kherson, and Zaporizhzhia) as part of Russia.
An end to Ukraine’s aspirations to join NATO.
Major concessions in exchange for a peace deal.
The Kremlin views the 19-point version as an unconstructive European counter-proposal and has not committed to any major concessions. Sources suggest Russia may be using delaying tactics to stall enforcement of sanctions and keep the U.S. engaged in talks without committing to peace.— Michael Novakhov (@mikenov) Nov 26, 2025